Should Rhode Island Eliminate the Sales Tax?
Do you think the 7 percent is killing small businesses? Should Rhode Island remove the tax to encourage commerce?
Massachusetts is considering lowering its 6.25 percent sales tax to 4.5 percent.
At least one lawmaker says the answer to that question is yes. Saying it is “about time we had a dialogue on this,” Rep. Jan P. Malik (D-Dist. 67, Barrington, Warren) has introduced legislation to eliminate the Rhode Island sales tax.
The bill, 2013-H 5365, calls for the end of the sales tax effective October 1 of this year. The bill provides that, as of that date, all regulations relating to the collection of sales tax and enforcement of collections will sunset and, further, that as of October 1, the local meals and beverage tax will also be eliminated.
“Our sales tax is killing small businesses, especially those in border communities,” said Representative Malik, who is a member of the House Committee on Finance to which the legislation has been referred. “I am one of the small business owners getting hammered because, at least in terms of sales tax, I cannot compete with my nearby Massachusetts competitors. I am down 20 percent in business over the past two years, and it doesn’t matter if we have low prices at my liquor store or not. People just don’t way to pay a sales tax when they can drive a few miles to Massachusetts where there is no sales tax on liquor.”
“How can Rhode Island continue to compete at 7 percent? How can Rhode Island restaurants compete at 8 percent? They can’t. We need to find a way to fix this, and a serious discussion of our sales tax is a discussion we need to have, now, before more small stores close their doors,” he said.
Representative Malik acknowledges that elimination of the sales tax will mean a void in revenue coming into the state, but he believes that competitiveness – by way of lower prices due to no sales tax – will spur economic activity, resulting in more businesses opening and hiring. “Any growth in economic activity in this state should be seen as a major plus, because business owners lives in the state and pay income and local taxes, and the people they employ live in the state and pay taxes, and the other companies that support these small businesses will also grow in volume,” he said.
Representative Malik said he is not wedded to a total elimination of the sales tax, but introduced the bill calling for that because “this is just to get the dialogue started. I just want our state to do better and to level the playing field for those businesses out there that are really hurting because other states are stealing away their customers.”
The Malik bill is co-sponsored by House Minority Leader Rep. Brian C. Newberry (R-Dist. 48, North Smithfield, Burrillville), Rep. Joseph M. McNamara (D-Dist. 19, Warwick, Cranston), Rep. Samuel A. Azzinaro (D-Dist. 37, Westerly), Rep. Arthur J. Corvese (D-Dist. 55, North Providence) and 28 other Representatives.
Should Rhode Island respond and eliminate sales tax to keep small businesses competitive? Tell us what you think in the comments section.
Joe Sousa
2:17 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Just lower it below Mass. and the Gas Tax too. Turn the tide on job loss and lack of Commercial ventures . Don't know if this legislature would be willing to cut the budget to invest.
Herb Weiss
2:54 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
If they toll the sakonnet river bridge combined with the seven percent sales tax and eight percent meal tax Aquidneck Island will now be called Ghost Island....
Herb Weiss
3:00 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
WELCOME to GHOST ISLAND Rhode Islands newest GATED COMMUNITY
Jim L
10:26 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
With all the talk of lowering taxes and new programs it seems to me that the only way to fund all this would be to make sure the new toll money makes it into the general fund,How about the state just start improving the business climate and creating new jobs, improve the money stream instead of just going back to the taxpayer again and again. Once again even in this hard times the state is going thru the teacher artbitraction bill has risen up again, is every one doing so well that they can just pay more and more, wITH THIS NEW BILL A THID PARTY WILL DECIDE ON A TOWNS ABLITY TO PAY MORE, not taxpayers, not school commitees, it will all be based on how much money your town has for everything, not just the school budget but the entire budget. And the old contract will stay in place while talks go on! why would the NEA do anything but get more money for it's members instead of school supplies?
Just Another Taxpayer
12:25 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
I guess Fake Jim L. did not have to go to work today?
Brain Mederble
12:46 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
I'm not so sure. Only the real Jim L could work in his obsession with the tolls, schools, "artbitraction", and the NEA into a story about sales tax. My vote is for real Jim.
Jim L
1:56 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Rather interesting the folls who show back up when the NEA and Binding Artbration is mentioned, Best to remain hidden you guys, taxpayers are looking for you
BD
2:40 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Now I think we can all agree THIS is Fake Jim L. Welcome back! I want to make this perfectly clear; Fake Jim L, are you denying you ran for office as a TCC-endorsed candidate?