patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

UPDATE: Lewis Comments After DOT Cuts Off Tuesday Toll Hearing

The state Department of Transportation Director Michael P. Lewis cut off Tuesday's toll hearing in Tiverton just after midnight, directing residents who did not get to speak to submit written comments.

 

Director Michael P. Lewis of the state Department of Transportation (DOT) ended Tuesday's toll hearing just after midnight on Tuesday, cutting off commentary from speakers.

The five-hour public hearing featured a steady line of residents, all but one who were in opposition to the placement of a toll on the Sakonnet River Bridge. The informational public hearing was conducted as part of the DOT's evaluation of the environmental impact a toll would have on the community, businesses and surrounding infrastructure and will be submitted to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) by the end of January 2013.

"The meeting was advertised until 10 p.m. and the meeting the night before ended around 10:30 or 10:45 p.m.," said Charles St. Martin, an information and public relations specialist for the DOT. "Last night went longer."

Outspoken toll opponent and member of the Sakonnet Toll Opposition Platform (STOP) Robert Coulter, chided Lewis and the DOT for ending the meeting without allowing all speakers to be heard, as Tiverton-Little Compton Patch reported Lewis promised at the beginning of the meeting.

"Lewis, despite promising to stay as long as it took to me, Chee [Laureano, chairwoman of Tiverton STOP], [Tiverton Town Council President Edward] Roderick, and [Councilman Jay J.] Lambert in a meeting last week, and saying it again tonight as you reported, cut off comment at the microphone and packed up before I and others could speak," said Coulter last night after the hearing. "I am concerned because they packed up, there is no record of this and we need a record for the federal challenge."

Lewis concluded the meeting just after midnight as the DOT's stenographer packed up. He and other DOT personnel stayed to discuss the residents' concerns.

"The two public workshops this week in Portsmouth and Tiverton were scheduled to 10 p.m. and each night the Department extended the meeting to allow those who had been standing and waiting in line to speak.," said Lewis. "Tuesday night’s meeting concluded early Wednesday morning. RIDOT welcomes written comments that will be included in the record along with all comment given at the meetings both verbally and in writing. All comments received will be included in the final report submitted to the Federal Highway Administration."

The DOT will be accepting written commentary through the end of its evaluation period until materials are submitted to the FHWA. 

Interested residents may download a comment form or fill out an electronic version for submission to the DOT. Comment can also be addressed without the form to RIDOT's Customer service at customerservice@dot.ri.gov or by mailing to the address below:

    Rhode Island Department of Transportation
    Attn: Office of Customer Service
    2 Capitol Hill 
    Providence, RI 02903

The effect of toll costs on individuals was a focus of Tuesday's dialogue. 

Ellen Tavares, a self-employed caregiver said she drives across the Sakonnet River Bridge a minimum of four times a day during the work week. 

"At five days a week, 52 days a year, just to work at about $1 a trip it will cost me over $1,000 a year," said Tavares. "Why is is fair for our small area of Rhode Island to bare the cost and upkeep of all the bridges and roads in our state?"

School Committeewoman Deborah Pallasch said the DOT was rushing through its environmental impact analysis without any real concern for the unintended costs the tolls would cause.

"I am extremely frustrated that we did not have enough time to really study the impacts these tolls will have on the services we provide [to Tiverton schools]," said Pallasch.

Many complained it was unfair that Newport County would be singled out in supporting the maintenance costs for it's two major bridges - the arteries for one of Rhode Island's biggest tourist destinations.

"We live on toll island," said Portsmouth resident Randy Martin before the hearing, greeting the public at the door to Tiverton High School with a pair of witty anti-toll signs. "With the way we are going now, proposing more and more tolls, we are not going to live in Rhode Island anymore. We might as well change the name and call us 'Toll Island.'"

The DOT is not responsible for setting a toll rate on the Sakonnet River Bridge. If the toll is approved by the FHWA after its reevaluation of the environmental impact survey, ownership of the bridge will transfer to the state Turnpike and Bridge Authority (RITBA). 

Transfer of the Sakonnet and Jamestown bridges will only be accepted by the RITBA if an adequate source of funding is secured - such as the tolls. No one from the RITBA was available to comment on Wednesday afternoon as to whether the public would be invited to participate in the setting a toll rate should the FHWA approve tolling on the Sakonnet River Bridge. According to the DOT, $38 million would need to be raised annually through tolls to support the RITBA's four bridges.

Related Topics: Bridge Toll, DOT, Sakonnet Bridge Toll, and Sakonnet River Bridge toll

r

10:05 am on Thursday, December 6, 2012

Why does the state build things and not figure in maintance of the the structure? The state needs to stop spending and up the state income tax to fix things. the state income tax will be shared by all RIer. Also if they have to toll why now the state line on rt24? they would still get their tolls maybe not as much but still something. so locals could use lesser road to go around it.

Reply

ralph

3:50 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012

Problem is the State of RI has always known that these bridges would eventually have to be replaced. Just like the Verazano bridge, which turned into a debacle of corruption. Just like most over spending zealots, the state has burdened itself with so much debt, it can't find funding for the maintenace of the bridge. Instead they feel they can soak the locals for tolls and generate another vehicle to bring in revenue to the state. Numbers don't add up. I don't care what experts they bring in. It's all a dog and pony show.

Reply

Leave a comment