Canario Bill Would Cap Special Ed Service Cost Hikes
A bill introduced recently by Rep. Dennis Canario would place a cap on private services for special education students in public schools and help keep budgets down.
A bill recently introduced by Rep. Dennis Canario would cap cost increases by private providers for special education services in public schools, keeping them in line with local budgets.
Canario (D-Dist. 71) learned of the stress placed on local budgets from cost increases by private providers after working with members of the Tiverton School Committee.
Canario, who has been who sought out his help to address the issue, said the answer “is not short-changing special needs students or trimming back other areas of a school budget to cover higher special education costs. It is finding a way to keep those outside costs from rising so much, so often.”
Legislation introduced by Canario, 2013-H 5203, would prohibit private educational service providers, such as the Groden Center, Bradley Hospital and others, from seeking an annual increase in payments from school departments greater than the 4 percent increase in tax levy increases allowed for municipalities by state law.
“Students with disabilities and special needs should never be the victims of budget problems in a community,” said Rep. Dennis M. Canario (D-Dist. 71, Portsmouth, Little Compton, Tiverton).
Yet as school departments face tighter budgets, and as costs increase from private special education providers, it is becoming more difficult for schools to ensure that the special education needs of some students can continue to be met.
“As a result of law enacted some years ago, the so-called “3050” that sets a 4 percent cap on municipal tax levy increases, municipal and school budgets can grow only so much,” said Rep. Dennis Canario. “In the face of that, it is a nightmare for schools departments to deal with special ed costs from private providers [growing] at 5 or 8 or 10 percent each year.”
Canario is looking to hold these private service providers to the same standards so that schools can continue to provide for special needs students within the confines of the budget.
“There may be instances when the specific kind of services provided by these agencies represents a significant change in the normal kinds of services, and obviously that would entail a higher fee,” he said. “But all else being equal, if communities have to live with a 4 percent increase every year, service agencies should not expect more than a 4 percent increase for their services.”
The Canario bill has been referred to the House Committee on Finance. It is co-sponsored by Rep. John G. Edwards (D-Dist. 70, Tiverton, Portsmouth), Rep. Linda Finn (D-Dist. 72, Portsmouth, Middletown), Rep. Raymond E. Gallison Jr. (D-Dist. 69, Bristol, Portsmouth) and Rep. Frank G. Ferri (D-Dist. 22, Warwick).
Renee Cwiek
6:23 am on Friday, February 1, 2013
And if a child needs services from Bradley or Grodon and you have capped it, what is that child to do? You're talking about communities living within their percent increases, but these children are part of our community. My child is part of this community, and yes, she needs services. Your bill seems rather vague in it's wording.
Renee Cwiek
6:32 am on Friday, February 1, 2013
“There may be instances when the specific kind of services provided by these agencies represents a significant change in the normal kinds of services, and obviously that would entail a higher fee,"
So then those services would be approved?
Joe Sousa.
1:04 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
Thank you Rep.Canario . These costs have gone up and up every years . Because they are an unfunded mandate, they should have some over site. I've seen as much as eight percent increases in one year . The Town gets the bill and is told to pay it no questions asked. This can not continue..
Tiverton Dad
1:08 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
I think it's worth asking whether this bill will protect services for kids with special needs, or put those services at risk.
Joe Sousa.
7:42 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013
What puts it at risk is abuse of the people paying the bills. There has to be checks and balance in the system . The increases every 365 days have put the whole system at risk.
Renee Cwiek
8:07 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013
I doubt you even have a clue what these services provide for our children. All you've ever seen are dollar signs.
I did get a private message explaining this bill in further detail and was very happy with the explanation. It put my mind at ease. None of our children will be denied the services they need.
Joe Sousa
7:03 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
Renee Cwiek We can't all spend like Liberals. A bankrupt system serves no one.
bigmanny
7:53 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013
JoeJay, perhaps this would be a good time to tell us about the dozen do nothing teachers that are soaking the Tiverton system. You mentioned them before during your losing campaign. How about helping the town with a big reveal?
Richard Joslin
8:51 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013
Bigmanny likes the young boys Don't ya
Renee Cwiek
8:56 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013
Seriously....my children are more mature than you. Stop being a little piece of crap sitting behind your computer screen where it's nice and safe for you to act like a douche.
bigmanny
9:31 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013
No Richard aka JoeJay Sousa alter ego. I think it may be something you seem to think about a lot since you keep posting about randomly. By the way Dick/JoeJay, what did I say to raise your ire this time.
Richard Joslin
9:35 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013
bigmanny likes the young boys Don't ya
Ryanthegirl
10:14 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013
I have a couple of questions. Where can I find a list of last year's expenses for private educational service providers for each school? Why is there a need for private educational service providers at all? Are these private providers hired to teach our students with special academic needs and does this cost include classes for our special education teachers? Last, what is the academic benefit for our students outside of full time special education teachers already in our schools?